Santiago Rodriguez Taverna vs Martin Borisiouk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Taverna's recent second serve success rate is 47.59%, outperforming Borisiouk's 40%. How might this affect their overall game? Taverna's stronger second serve suggests a solid baseline performance.
• In returning second serves, Taverna has won 46.61% of points while Borisiouk has achieved 43.48%. Who has the edge? Taverna, as their ability to return serves effectively could be crucial in the match.
• When focusing on returning first serves, Taverna stands at 30.92%, far ahead of Borisiouk’s 22.22%. This could prove significant in breaking serve during the match.
• Under pressure moments, Taverna has saved 52.87% of breakpoints compared to Borisiouk's 33.33%. How does this influence in-game situations? The ability to save breakpoints might swing tight games in Taverna's favor.
• Overall yearly performance reveals Borisiouk's higher win rate at 70.83% versus Taverna's 59.34%. Could Borisiouk's higher win rate indicate a psychological advantage?
• Taverna thrives on Hard courts with a win percentage of 64%, whereas Borisiouk performs best on I.hard at 64%. The surface could play a pivotal role in determining the outcome.
• In the last year, Borisiouk has predominantly played in Futures/Satellites events, boasting an 81.25% win rate, compared to Taverna's 51.61% in higher-tier tournaments. Does the competition level suggest Taverna is more experienced against tougher opponents?
• Facing tougher opponents on average (rank 366.47), Taverna has been challenged more compared to Borisiouk, whose average opponent rank is 407.46.
• In deciding sets, Taverna has a 72% victory rate, significantly higher than Borisiouk’s 43%. Could endurance in long matches give Taverna an advantage?
• Both players have different breakpoint conversion efficiencies, with Borisiouk slightly ahead at 33.33% over Taverna’s 31.63%. How might breakpoint opportunities decide the match?

Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):

Taverna's effectiveness in both serving and returning, especially on the second serve, could play a significant role in establishing dominance on the court. His ability to win crucial points with a higher breakpoint saving percentage suggests resilience under pressure.

Despite Borisiouk's impressive win rate over the past year, the difference in the competition level faced by both players serves as a key consideration. While Borisiouk has excelled on the I.hard surface, the match's surface may not necessarily be to his advantage.

The higher experience level of Taverna, coupled with his performance during deciding sets, positions him as a favorable contender. While both players exhibit strengths, Taverna's comprehensive edge in critical areas suggests he is more likely to win the upcoming match.